First, I never knowingly do business at a christian run or owned business. If christians are going to openly target my child, who happens to be trans and call for her death it is the least I can do.
Second, I read where this wildebeest says her god is calling her to explain what his plan for marriage is to everyone. But this is an imaginary case. No LGBGT person actually asked her to design anything. So her god is calling her to do this by having her imagine this scenario? If he was really calling her wouldn’t there be a real people involved and not just her imaginings? Must we all be governed by her god?
The supremeless court has outlived its usefulness. We all know it is so compromised as to be not only useless to the common man but very harmful.
It’s actually worse than you’ve explained. The supposed customer was recently Interviewed by the New Republic and turns out that he had no idea he’d been named in this lawsuit and wasn’t even gay. He is a progressive and not happy about the situation and perplexed as to why, during the pendency of this action, no other reporter ever contacted him. Essentially, in legal terms, there was no justiciable controversy here - a foundational standard that has always been a requirement before this SCOTUS came upon us. I’m not a SCOTUS expert but I understand there is a rehearing procedure. Perhaps someone will step up to the plate - Colorado AG? ACLU? LAMBDA Legal Defense?
You’re my fave. Xoxo
First, I never knowingly do business at a christian run or owned business. If christians are going to openly target my child, who happens to be trans and call for her death it is the least I can do.
Second, I read where this wildebeest says her god is calling her to explain what his plan for marriage is to everyone. But this is an imaginary case. No LGBGT person actually asked her to design anything. So her god is calling her to do this by having her imagine this scenario? If he was really calling her wouldn’t there be a real people involved and not just her imaginings? Must we all be governed by her god?
The supremeless court has outlived its usefulness. We all know it is so compromised as to be not only useless to the common man but very harmful.
Mr. Gurko, I not only enjoy all you do I agree.
Anna Birr
How is this justifiable? The "aggrieved" person didn't having standing if not "harmed".
It’s actually worse than you’ve explained. The supposed customer was recently Interviewed by the New Republic and turns out that he had no idea he’d been named in this lawsuit and wasn’t even gay. He is a progressive and not happy about the situation and perplexed as to why, during the pendency of this action, no other reporter ever contacted him. Essentially, in legal terms, there was no justiciable controversy here - a foundational standard that has always been a requirement before this SCOTUS came upon us. I’m not a SCOTUS expert but I understand there is a rehearing procedure. Perhaps someone will step up to the plate - Colorado AG? ACLU? LAMBDA Legal Defense?
The window is within 25 days of the ruling. Curious to see what happens.